| |||
![]() |
Taking the Lid Off F1 Formula One Technical Analysis | ||
by Will Gray, England |
Atlas F1 presents a series of articles by certified engineer Will Gray, that investigates in greater depth all the technical areas involved in design, development, and construction of a Formula One car.
Aerodynamics is often called the 'Black Art'. It is a fascinating subject - making something you can't see do something you can is quite impressive. By making the car a certain shape, an aerodynamicist can make the air flow over it in a certain manner. If the shape is designed correctly, the airflow can create a downward force on the car which is then transferred to the track by its tyres, and hence Aerodynamic Grip is created. However, this useful force comes with the price of Drag - a force which slows the car down.
In each tunnel run, the model is automatically moved through four different ride heights, to simulate straight running, acceleration and braking, and to analyse the car's stability. Real time data covering properties such as lift (separated front and rear), drag, and aerodynamic centre of pressure is constantly taken from the model, and averaged for each set of ride heights during the run. This averaged data is then studied by the Aerodynamicist for trends showing the performance of the new part under test, or showing a possible problem such as something coming loose leading to false results. Based on this data, the part is rejected, re-tested, or modified for further testing.
Much use of plastacine used to be made in a wind tunnel - yes plastacine! In the development of a car for the following season, the aerodynamicists had ideas and developed them at the tunnel by molding plastacine and using chopped up carbon fibre pieces or whatever was around to test their theory on the car. Although not entirely accurate, this was a good method to take a look-see and assess whether it was worth pursuing that idea further by designing and manufacturing a more accurate piece before the following test. In doing this, much time was saved in the drawing office and model shop by avoiding devices that would not work. This process was also used when developing the car for the following year.
With more automated manufacturing processes, it is now possible to process a greater number of parts, so there is no need to use the plastacine, 'cut and shut' routine. This removes the possibility of erroneous results from ad-hoc modifications, and also eliminates the need for reverse engineering - working out how to draw the physical modifications made in the wind tunnel. However, the new methods make the job of the aerodynamicist less dynamic, for although he still analyses the data after every run, that doesn't affect the test itself, and it will always run to a planned timetable.
It is clear that wind tunnel testing is responsible for the development and set-up of the car, and with aerodynamics becoming more and more the most critical element, the work done here determines, and limits much of the cars design.
Previous Parts in this Series: Parts 1 & 2 | Part 3 | Part 4A | Part 4B | Part 4C | Part 5A | Part 5B | Part 6A | Part 6B
|
Will Gray | © 2000 Kaizar.Com, Incorporated. |
Send comments to: gray@atlasf1.com | Terms & Conditions |